Claim(permalink)
"I don't think so, because there was no crime. You know it's high crimes and, not with or or, it's high crimes and misdemeanors. There was no high crime and there was no misdemeanor, so how do you impeach based on that?"
✓factcheckorg rating: not verifiable; published on 2019-05-30
Factors
veracity
not verifiable
Political Leaning
left political leaning
Sentiment
neutral sentiment
Date published
2019-05-30
Entities
MarsReince PriebusHMS UrgeCriminal justiceJudicial reviewHillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaignThe Evidence (TV series)United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary2016 United States electionsHigh CrimeUnited States Air Force AcademyKen StarrMisdemeanorFederal government of the United StatesPrinceton UniversityWatergate scandalImpeachment of Bill ClintonPerjuryMonica LewinskyRussian interference in the 2016 United States electionsSteve BannonBaltimoreWilliam BarrSoviet UnionImpeachment in the United StatesUnited States Department of JusticeRobert MuellerDirector of the Federal Bureau of InvestigationPound sterlingUnited States Attorney GeneralOval OfficeRichard NixonUnited States Department of Homeland SecurityJames ComeyDonald Trump 2016 presidential campaignTreasonWikiLeaksConstitution of the United StatesPresidency of Donald TrumpEnglish languageColoradoVirginiaCourtVice President of the United StatesUnited States SenateSupreme Court of the United StatesUnited States CongressFederal Bureau of InvestigationRussiaVladimir PutinTexasNew York CityHillary ClintonPresident of the United StatesWalter NixonThe Federalist PapersGeorgia State UniversityFirst-order logicTiptoesHal GreerHarry B. WhittingtonCrime bossLinux.conf.auUndue influenceFederalismThe InjuryNational Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceGovernment of Russia