CIMPLE Explorer
  • Reviews
0 search results
English
Claim(permalink)
Writes that climate change “alarmists” ignore the “positive impacts” of more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere on agriculture.
✓factcheckorg rating: not verifiable; published on 2017-08-11
Factors
veracity
not verifiable
Political Leaning
left political leaning
Sentiment
neutral sentiment
Date published
2017-08-11
Entities
MarsSherwood ForestCalifornia winePine nutSugarcane2007 Nobel Peace PrizeBarleyCellular respirationParts-per notationFood securityMoleculeStrawberryMidwestern United StatesCherryOzoneGlucoseFertilizerUnited States Department of AgricultureIntergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeApplied Digital Data SystemsTypes of tennis matchOp-edIronWheatVitamin CCosta RicaWineZincNicaraguaEl SalvadorFossil fuelProteinWyomingMaizeFlowerIowaUniversity of WashingtonRiceCoffeeHarvard UniversityOxygenEnergyEarthCarbon dioxideUnited NationsUnited KingdomUnited StatesAlan MooreJuicingCrop yieldPerennial cropInbreedingMelissa GilbertClimate changeWet seasonHurricane AliciaNet ImpactPhotosynthesisNortheast ChinaSustainable agricultureStaple foodGoddard Institute for Space StudiesGrasslandBiomassTemperate climateThe Heritage FoundationCarbohydrateDimension FilmsSoil erosionPrecipitationJames River

The data contained in CIMPLE Explorer comes from CIMPLE Knowledge Base. CIMPLE Explorer has been developed at EURECOM.

CIMPLE Explorer
English
ReviewsClaim-review